October 17, 2010

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

TIGHTS AS PANTS = NO
(Uggs = double no, but not the point)
TIGHTS UNDER DRESS/SKIRT: COULD WORK
Notice how it doesn't have to be black tights...
PANTS: YES
For me, this look is way more attractive than the first, and the only thing hanging out is a shoulder.

Not saying no one can pull it off, some can, but the "Uggs and the tights as pants" look....not a good look. Regular dudes would probably say continue, we don't need to use our imagination anymore. As a guy who's into fashion and respecting women, I would say you probably shouldn't let it all hang out like that. But whatever, do you.

Now back to whatever you were doing....for me, it's studying, writing papers, and not sleeping.

4 comments:

  1. I don't know man, the tights as pants look works when you have a butt like hers....if not please don't try this at home.

    ReplyDelete
  2. s.teezie chan.yeezieOctober 18, 2010 at 2:23 AM

    i actually feel that the first look is much more conservative than the last, but that's just me. i don't think i ever interpreted the tights as pants look as being particularly provocative look, so i wouldn't agree with you in that respect that wearing tights as pants is any more demeaning than wearing pants. you may be right about the fashion angle, but man your fashion sense was always off kid. ahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not saying the tights as pants look is provocative, I'm just saying it's so tight that the wrong things are showing that really shouldn't be showing (front view). And fashion-wise, it's just not that great of a look. But everyone's entitled to their opinion, thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete
  4. it just looks vulgar not provocative.

    ReplyDelete